Structured candidate scoring with competency-based rubrics
Score every candidate against the competencies that matter for the role — with structured rubrics per test type, side-by-side comparisons, and percentile rankings.
Already a customer? Sign in to your dashboard
Evaluate candidates objectively
Competency-level scorecards
Evaluate candidates against the competencies defined for each role. Get structured rubric scores per test type, competency breakdowns, and percentile rankings.
Side-by-side candidate comparison
Compare candidates on the same assessment with parallel scorecards. Filter, sort, and rank by overall score, specific competencies, or proctoring flags.
Collaborative evaluation workflows
Share candidate results with hiring managers. Add comments, tag team members, request additional reviews, and track decision status collaboratively.
Everything you need to evaluate candidates fairly
From individual scorecards to batch analytics, make informed hiring decisions with comprehensive candidate data.
Detailed candidate scorecards
View comprehensive reports with overall scores (0-100), competency breakdowns, per-test-type analysis, improvement recommendations, and response highlights.
Comparative analytics
Rank candidates by score, view percentile distributions, identify top performers by competency, and spot outliers. Filter by role, job profile, or assessment batch.
Integrity and proctoring insights
Review proctoring flags (tab switches, paste events, look-away, multiple persons) alongside assessment scores. Make fair decisions with full context.
Collaborative review tools
Add notes to candidate profiles, tag hiring managers for review, track decision status (Under Review, Shortlisted, Rejected, Offer Extended), and maintain evaluation history.
Trend and cohort analysis
Track candidate quality trends over time. Compare cohorts across hiring campaigns. Identify which sourcing channels produce top performers.
Export and integration
Export candidate results as PDF reports or CSV for ATS import. Integrate with HRIS systems to sync candidate data and hiring decisions.
From assessment to hiring decision
Streamlined candidate evaluation workflow designed for hiring teams making high-stakes decisions.
Candidates complete assessments
Candidates work through multi-test assessments (case study, SJT, MCQ). Proctoring runs in the background. Results automatically populate your evaluation dashboard.
Review structured scorecards
Access detailed candidate scorecards with competency breakdowns, percentile rankings, proctoring flags, and AI-generated improvement recommendations. Review responses and scoring rationale.
Collaborate and decide
Compare candidates side-by-side, share results with hiring managers, add evaluation notes, and move candidates through decision stages. Export shortlists for interview scheduling.
Reduce bias with structured evaluation
Standardized scorecards and transparent criteria help hiring teams make fair, defensible decisions.
Structured evaluation criteria
Every candidate is evaluated on identical competencies using the same structured rubrics. Eliminates subjective gut-feel decisions and reduces unconscious bias in screening.
Transparent scoring methodology
See exactly how scores are calculated. AI provides detailed reasoning for each competency score with examples from candidate responses. No black-box algorithms.
Fair interpretation of proctoring flags
Proctoring flags surface as additional context, not automatic disqualification. We provide guidelines for interpreting flags fairly and avoiding false positives.
Audit trail for compliance
Complete history of evaluation decisions, scorecard views, comments, and status changes. Defensible hiring process for EEOC compliance and internal audits.
Explore Related Solutions
Discover more ways Kaairo can help your organization hire and develop talent.
Frequently Asked Questions
What competencies do you evaluate candidates on?
Kaairo evaluates candidates against the competencies you define for each role. Choose from a library of system competencies or let AI recommend domain-specific ones based on the job profile. Each test type has its own structured rubric, and all scores normalise to a 0–100 scale for easy comparison across candidates.
How does side-by-side candidate comparison work?
View multiple candidate scorecards in parallel. Sort by overall score, specific dimensions, or proctoring flags. Filter candidates by score thresholds, competency levels, or job profile. Export comparison tables as CSV.
Can multiple team members evaluate candidates?
Yes. Invite hiring managers and recruiters to view candidate results. Each user can add comments, tag colleagues for review, and update candidate status. Track who reviewed which candidates and when.
What candidate information is shown in scorecards?
Candidate name, email, assessment completion time, overall score, per-competency scores, per-test-type breakdowns, percentile ranking, proctoring flags (if enabled), response excerpts, and AI-generated improvement recommendations.
How should we use proctoring flags in evaluation?
Proctoring flags provide context, not verdicts. A single tab switch may be innocent (checking email). Repeated paste events warrant investigation. Use flags to inform follow-up interview questions, not automatic disqualification.
Can we customize evaluation criteria?
Yes. Define your own competency framework, choose which test types to include, and weight each test differently based on role requirements. AI can also recommend competencies and test combinations tailored to your job profile.
How do we export candidate results?
Export individual PDF scorecards, bulk CSV reports with all candidate scores, or filtered exports (e.g., only shortlisted candidates). CSV exports include all competency scores, test-type breakdowns, and proctoring flags for ATS import.
What happens after candidates are evaluated?
Move candidates through decision stages (Shortlisted, Interview Scheduled, Offer Extended, Rejected). Export shortlists for interview coordination. Integrate with your ATS to sync candidate status and hiring decisions.
Make better hiring decisions with structured evaluation
See how our candidate evaluation system can reduce bias and improve hiring quality.
Talk to us about your team
Share a few details about your org and what you're trying to solve. We'll follow up with a short call or an async walkthrough of how Kaairo can plug into your hiring, benchmarking, or L&D workflows.